Broken Press

536 examples of press incompetence

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

This is doom-marketing ('we're so powerful that...') and regulatory capture ('let me say how to regulate me') and media are journalists are swallowing it without journalism. AGI is BS.
Anthropic C.E.O.: Don’t Let A.I. Companies off the Hook

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

Meanwhile, the ' Trumpcentric Weltanschauung positions his norm-nuking as his "test."
Germany’s Leader Heads to the Oval Office, Hoping to Pass Trump’s Test

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

Idiotic in so many ways: an AI tool to help outsiders code switch to op-edese; importing more conservatives from Substack, as if they didn't have enough already; shrugs from other papers.

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

Douthat: "The willingness to swerve and backpedal and contradict himself is a big part of what keeps the president viable"
What an idiot.
Why Trump Is Resilient

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

This headline makes it sound as if Trump has sound reasoning. It is a form of policy sanewashing:

Posted by @normative.bsky.social

I think this points up some of the failures of coverage of Trump's lawlessness: You could've read dozens of articles on Trump's tariff policy with no inkling of how unprecedented & legally dubious was the legal authority he claimed to impose them.

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

This is thin reporting missing critical angles of eugenics in these faux philosophies. Instead of talking to critics--Gebru, Torres--it quotes cult philosophers MacAskill, Tegmark. Google TESCREAL.

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

To the , shredding the Constitution in a fascist, authoritarian coup is a "power move."

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

news judgment centers Trump threats over Trump loss.

student visa headlines over tariff court decision
student visa headlines over tariff court decision
Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

He "suggests limit." The makes it sound as if it is a reasonable negotiation, not an unpardonable, xenophobic attack on education.
Trump Suggests Limit on International Students at Harvard

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

It takes 5 reporters to tell us he is "disappointed" and "frustrated." Ask me whether I give a holy fuck about his pouting after destroying countless lives. I don't.
A Disillusioned Musk, Distanced From Trump, Says He’s Exiting Washington

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

In which VandeHei swallows AI BS whole--and by implication warns his own staff they're toast. AI's promised efficiencies are not planning out.
Behind the Curtain: A white-collar bloodbath

Posted by @joshsternberg.com

Agenda setting:

"Of 14,777 unique articles on the Times’ homepage over the 310 day tracking period, 293 articles–almost one a day–focused on Biden’s age compared with just 27 articles focused on Project 2025, a ratio of 10.9 to one."

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

"In the cross hairs." No, headline writers, do not use violent imagery with this violent regime and cult, especially regarding a Black women with power. Think.

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

Search for the words "racist" or "racism" in this white-glove treatment of Trump's bigotry and the return to Jim Crow America and you will not find them.

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

The worst of sanewashing rolls right over its own caveat: "Some close observers of Mr. Trump...caution against thinking his actions and statements are strategic... Yet..."
Trump’s Vision: One World, Three Powers?

Posted by @carstenfranke@mastodon.social

Please note, corruption is now called "monetize the presidency"

The image is a screenshot of a webpage from The New York Times. At the top, the website's logo is prominently displayed in black text against a white background. Below the logo, the date "Sunday, May 25, 2025" is shown. The main content area features an analysis article with the headline "As Trumps Monetize Presidency, Profits Outstrip Protests" in bold black text. The subheading provides context: "President Trump and his family have monetized the White House more than any other occupant, normalizing activities that once would have provoked heavy blowback."
The image is a screenshot of a webpage from The New York Times. At the top, the website's logo is prominently displayed in black text against a white background. Below the logo, the date "Sunday, May 25, 2025" is shown. The main content area features an analysis article with the headline "As Trumps Monetize Presidency, Profits Outstrip Protests" in bold black text. The subheading provides context: "President Trump and his family have monetized the White House more than any other occupant, normalizing activities that once would have provoked heavy blowback."
Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

praises autocrat. He didn't "work with Congress." He dictated to his castrated Republicans.
Trump has proved he can work with Congress. He should try it again.

Posted by @jeffjarvis@mastodon.social

The second paragraph tears down the premise of the headline and story. But both barrel ahead anyway, the third graf asserting: that the killings "cast a harsh spotlight on the pro-Palestinian movement." In the , it does.

But the ties of Elias Rodriguez, the suspect, to the wider pro-Palestinian movement remain unclear. Was he a vigilante, upset at the deaths of civilians in Gaza, who decided on his own that violence was the only way forward? Or was he influenced by more extreme pro-Palestinian organizations that reach Americans online and that glorify the actions of Hamas and other armed resistance groups?
But the ties of Elias Rodriguez, the suspect, to the wider pro-Palestinian movement remain unclear. Was he a vigilante, upset at the deaths of civilians in Gaza, who decided on his own that violence was the only way forward? Or was he influenced by more extreme pro-Palestinian organizations that reach Americans online and that glorify the actions of Hamas and other armed resistance groups?
Posted by @noupside.bsky.social

A more appropriate headline would be “Lawfare campaign expands against ideological enemies of Elon Musk”